Does 'The Joy Luck Club' Need a Revival?

October 30, 2007

This seems to happen a lot – collective bashing of Amy Tan by progressive, intellectual Asian Americans for creating that Chinatown-centric, exotified genre of writing that publishers can’t look beyond.

I remember hungrily reading the thick paperback version of The Joy Luck Club when I was in 9th grade, but more visceral was going to see the movie when I was 15 years old with my mother. I remember crying boatloads of tears, feeling some kind of release at seeing the portrayals of difficult mother-daughter relationships. I was in the throes of teen angst back then and my mother and I didn’t see eye-to-eye on anything, the cultural gap between us was a giant chasm. It was years before I understood this seperation more clearly and we worked through it – but I remember, for a moment, in that theater that we felt connected. Later, my hip, intellectual uncle asked me what I thought of the movie and I told him how much I loved it. He chided me for falling for such crap and I remember defending it by saying he didn’t understand because he was a man. Sigh, how far I’ve come from those hungry days of grasping at any kind of representation.

But even though I’ve grown a lot in the past 16 years since I first read the book, the story refuses to go away. The Pan-Asian Repertory Theater in New York City is doing a revival of Susan Kim’s stage adaptation of The Joy Luck Club.

I don't know a whole heck of a lot about theater, but I know revivals come with a lot of thought. So, why this play at this time? Is there a certain political or cultural resonance? Last year, the theater showed a one-act by Philip Kan Gotanda about a troubled marriage between a Japanese American woman and her African American husband and Tea, about five Japanese American war brides who move to Kansas. PLus a revival of the Vincent Chin-inspired Carry the Tiger to the Mountain, which actually sounds really awesome.

Anyway, in this interview, the young, Asian American actresses talk about the universality of the play and the strong characters they get to play, but I'm still not sold. Shouldn't big Asian American theater companies be pushing for new, interesting work? Or is this a ploy to get mainstream America to come to the play?

Contributor: 

Comments

Comments

hi neela,you know, i'd recently gotten over my amy tan vilifying, after coming to a sort-of conclusion that it isn't necessarily the "white" mainstream keeping joy luck club alive and prominent in its collective consciousness. i actually am coming to believe that API's kind of do this to ourselves in many ways, if as writers seeking book contracts (however lucrative or not), or because it feels like it'd be more complicated and difficult to explain to mainstream readers why joy luck club doesn't necessarily represent many API experiences.in my experience as an author interfacing with readers, that conversation, if it comes up at all (and when it does, it actually comes from API's of the generation previous to mine), can be a fruitful one re: tropes and how it's really bad practice as a writer (of any ethnicity) to continue to rely upon them, when already overused.that said, i think your use of the word "ploy" is perhaps a little strong? though i might have said something similar in trying to understand the pan-asian repertory theatre's motives: strategy.
i think one of the biggest struggles that theatre companies have to deal with is the issue of bringing in the audience = money. if mainstream theatre companies are struggling with it, i can't imagine what it's like for asian american theatre companies.there are theatre companies out there that try to strike a balance between seeking new and experimental works versus doing something that's considered a "classic" in the theatre world. for example, doing 3 or 4 less well known plays and then finishing the seaon off with a grand good ol' musical. sometimes they're successful, and sometimes they're not. they want to strike the balance of achieving their mission statement, but at the same time, keep the theatre company above water.we have to look at what theatre has become today; i talk to a lot of young people about going to see a theatre performance and most people look at me like "ha, you're funny. wait, you're serious?" or they'll simply decline politely by saying, "oh interesting, but nah it's not really my thing." thing?! so here's the theatre dilemma. how do we reach out to the younger generation and not scare them off by doing some crazy, experimental theatre stuffed with theatre philosophies and different method acting?because amy tan's "joy luck club" is so well known that the company's marketing can just sort of ride on that. there's no need to explain what this "thing" is about. it's like, telling people to come see a production of "romeo and juliet." we have to admit. the work itself IS a selling point. but still, it is an adapted play from the novel, so we might be pleasantly surprised at the outcocme of this revival? i'm definitely interested in finding out.
They should get rid of all the men in the play since it caused so many problems. The main storyline was between Jade and her mom and Jade didn't have any love interests.
Not to go totally negative, but Pan-Asian Rep has a long rep of being way behind the ball on these questions (I mean, didn't they do a "revival" of South Pacific or something a number of years back?). There are a lot of better theater companies in NYC (Ma-Yi, for one), and far far better ones on the West Coast. But the questions, generally, are good ones.
Pan Asian Repertory is celebrating thirty years of creating theatre with a "Masterpiece Season." http://panasianrep.org/images/proclamation/PAproclamationLG.pngThey staged the New York premiere of The Joy Luck Club in 1999. If they didn't include a reprisal during this masterpiece season, they would certainly be faulted!