Hindu Leaders Worried About "The Love Guru"

March 25, 2008

mike.jpg

Reno, Nevada based “Hindu chaplain” Rajan Zed – formerly famous for being the guy that led the U.S. and California senate through an opening Hindu prayer back in 2007 – is now carefully taking on Meyer’s portrayal of a Hindu spiritual leader.

Concerned about the portrayal of “the guru” – who Zed says “is a highly revered spiritual teacher/master/preceptor in Hinduism who helps remove the ignorance of the seeker and who leads one from darkness to light,” he has pushed Paramount Pictures to offer a preview screening for Hindu leaders and is urging them to “be positively responsive to the concerns the Hindu leaders point out after watching the movie at the pre-screening event and be prepared to make amends if requested.”

Other Hindu orgs like Shri Ramayan Pracharini Sabha have joined in with concern. According to a press release: “In a statement in India, its General Secretary Rakesh Nagpal said that portrayal of Hindu characters like buffoons is not acceptable.”

We here at Hyphen know very well how serious the role of The Guru is, in fact, the buffoonery and sometimes outright murderous behavior of infamous gurus inspired our own “Gurus Gone Wild” chart (Issue 11) chronicling the lives and misdeeds of gurus the world over, like Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, aka Osho – who “[K]ept 90 Rolls Royces. He once bragged that he had made love to more women than any other man on earth.”

I don’t think "The Love Guru" looks very good, but I also think that it is making fun of the whole exotification of Eastern spirituality by the West. If Mike Meyers had donned brownface to play this role it would have been one thing, but he doesn’t. They don’t really show so much of his life in India in the preview, so it may be too early to tell how offensive this is. I wonder if any British people were offended by his portrayal of Austin Powers?

Check out the trailer here:

Categories: 
Contributor: 

Comments

Comments

I don't think you can class Osho as a Hindu Guru. He was in a league of his own. An Intelligent man who formed his own sinister cult, however helped many in their lives.Most mainstream Hindu Gurus are not like that. Please see Swami Vivekananda, Aurobindo, Ramana Maharishi, Ramakrishna Paramhansa, Paramhansa Yogananda, Swami Sivananda, Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, Amma, Sivaya Subramuniyaswami, Swami Chinmayananda, Karunamayi Maa ...
I'm not sure why they made this movie. It seems to be a lower quality rehash of 2002's The Guru, which I thought was quite charming and poked fun at the West's hunger for mystical Eastern love lessons without being offensive. Plus, its guru is actually played by a handsome Indian fella.
These folks shouldn't be so thin-skinned. If you want your religion to thrive in America you have to you have to understand the modern American pasttime of poking fun at the religious. The reason we CAN poke fun is the same reason we can practice our religion as we see fit without fear of persecution.
Defamation leads to persecution!
Defamation is a tricky word. Unless you're speaking in the legal sense (and I doubt this fist any legal definition of defamation) this word is most often subjective. One can say that any less-than-flattering comment is defammatory. But really, is Paramount Pictures in the position to persecute anyone? Do you think Mike Myers is going to insite anti-Hundu sentiments by this performance? I think not. I do think the overreaction by Hindu organisations will cause more backlash than anything Myers could hope to do.
Ed is absolutely correct. America is the Land of the Free where we can live without fear of persecution.I mean, just ask all those Muslims who were rounded up and ethnically cleansed ... I mean deported by America after Sept. 11th.Or ask Jose Padilla and other Muslims imprisoned in America's Gitmo Gulag.I am sooooo glad that I live in the good old USA.